This is a great pose. Reminds me of that comic cover for Crisis (George Perez).
7/25/2008,ArbiterChrono
|
there are some nice shots within this pose
7/24/2008,marshall
|
Good model. Nice pose.
7/22/2008,marshall
|
Nice pose. Very natural.
Variants with upper body twist and slight flex of one leg (while keeping feet planted next to one another) would be good too. Thanks!
7/22/2008,marshall
|
Good one. Close to what I want for one of my projects.
7/17/2008,tvc
|
too much hair!
7/15/2008,rkersting
|
this pose could really use images from overhead (looking down)
5/4/2008,Lisa
|
Let us know if you have any ideas for Ansleigh poses.
4/30/2008,Douglas
|
Would like to see more casual poses.
3/12/2008,Douglas
|
Beutiful girl and beutiful pose
2/28/2008,boneyard
|
Great ! Need more of this and with one light source from upper left or right.
2/24/2008,patt
|
I think too that even some unusual back lighting is good
2/24/2008,patt
|
look forward to seeing more poses with shadows
2/10/2008,wculbert
|
One of our goals is to capture a variety of postures and expressions, even if the result is not a beautiful photo. Slouching is one of those postures. Credit to Shandra for allowing herself to be photographed in a less than flattering pose.
1/22/2008,Douglas
|
Everything is photographed in rotation, so Jesse is in the light half the time. Click Show All Angles above.
1/22/2008,Douglas
|
Shanda's pose is nice, her face has a nice serenity but her left hand seems to be hidden underneath the material and is just a lump...I'd suggest that perhaps it should meet her other hand and either go over her right hand or perhaps her right hand c
1/20/2008,dianecaudle
|
Why is the guy almost totally in the dark while the female is beautifully lit?
1/20/2008,dianecaudle
|
I think this pose would be more effective if Shandra was doing something else with the material besides clenching it in front of herself. A pose where she had the material draped partly over her arm and her breasts would be nice and also, tilting he
1/20/2008,dianecaudle
|
I would have liked to have seen this pose with some sheer fabric draped on part of her body. As an artist I much prefer adding some sort of draped material to a model. I think the 'mystery' of what is hidden beneath the material is much more inter
1/20/2008,dianecaudle
|
I don't think it's a good pose: her body is too slouchy, her face has a 'don't care' look as she looks at the viewer and the pose is not particulary flattering to her body at all, especially with her legs spread out a little.
1/20/2008,dianecaudle
|
In this case, the draping just obscures the models forms too much, I think, to make the pose very useful.
1/15/2008,ebelfs2
|
This pose actually does a better job of being a draping reference than the shots with the sheer cloth. But I think that both draping schemes are useful in studying body draping.
1/15/2008,ebelfs2
|
The head proportion diagram is specifically for class instruction. Personally, I don't think that a tool or two for class instruction among the catalog of poses is a bad idea at all. Remember everone has to start out.
1/15/2008,ebelfs2
|
Quite well done! Let's see the head proportion diagram applied to a few other models as well.
1/15/2008,ebelfs2
|
I would like to see more experimentation with sheer cloth like this, perhaps sometimes wetted to encourage it to drape more closely to the model's form.
1/15/2008,ebelfs2
|
I agree with graybann. The kneeling figure of Jesse is very good but too dark to use.
1/11/2008,LisaB
|
Superb classical position dividing weight between her left leg and the column
1/7/2008,Maltart
|
Great idea,esp. for the beginning artist. Even though I'm a little past 'beginning' I would like to see more poses that include the 'grid', namely more dynamic poses.
12/21/2007,tarpalsfan
|
Good
12/20/2007,tarpalsfan
|
Cont'd...Hasselberg's "Snowdrop" and "Waterlily" sculptures would be a great basis for a Mandy pose!
12/17/2007,damyers3
|
This frankly is spectacular...although as a sculptor I'd like to have the pose in full light as well. Your intended allusion was Bernini's St Theresa but it is even closer to Daniel Chester French's Andromeda! Please check out KarlPeter Hasselberg'
12/17/2007,damyers3
|
Our objective was a compact form with facial detail visible.
12/14/2007,Douglas
|
This is really hot - she would be great to sculpt. and there is that wonderfully coy look she's giving ...
12/12/2007,ficrost
|
This is beautiful to paint!
12/12/2007,Boris Bello
|
This is wonderful to paint!
12/12/2007,Boris Bello
|
This is wonderful for painting!
12/12/2007,Boris Bello
|
This was requested by numerous customers. I'm glad it's useful for a class, though.
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
This one is inspired by "Emperor Octavian as Jupiter" from the 1st Century.
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
You're right, I probably cropped this preview image too much. The foot IS visible in the actual finished pose.
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
This was one of a series of poses that shows what happens to the body when you are wearing shoes. The whole point was that the feet were not flat on the floor.
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
Thanks! We were attempting Bernini's Ecstasy of St. Theresa. See, for example (www.bbc.co.uk/arts/powerofart/images/popups/bernini.jpg)
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
The roses are there to hide the prop and to restrain the cloth so it doesn't hide the model. We prefer not to have the same blank expression in every pose, a slight smile adds variety and I therefore think makes it a more effective reference.
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
She choose to look different than your typical art model. Not to everyone's taste, perhaps, but the world has variety.
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
The shoes were added on purpose to show what they do to the leg muscles and how the posture changes.
12/11/2007,Douglas
|
nope. This model seems artificial. Not an an art model
12/11/2007,marshall
|
lose the smile, the lipstick and roses.
12/11/2007,marshall
|
This is a nice Balthus kind of pose. I'm glad you resisted the urge to reflect light into the shadow in the leg area.
12/11/2007,marshall
|
good
12/11/2007,marshall
|
OK I guess. Do we really need roses and so much back arch?
12/11/2007,marshall
|
Nice!
12/11/2007,marshall
|
Nice
12/11/2007,marshall
|
Nice. It wasn't spoiled by some dramatic gestural thing that many of the other poses suffer from.
12/11/2007,marshall
|
lose the shoes
12/11/2007,marshall
|
would have been a good pose except for whats going on with those feet? Can't a model put the feet FLAT on the floor?
12/11/2007,marshall
|
don't like the distortion caused by the low angle.
12/11/2007,marshall
|
good pose
12/11/2007,marshall
|
good.
12/11/2007,marshall
|
If the left foot were flat on the floor the leg wouldn't look awkward. Good pose otherwise.
12/11/2007,marshall
|
nice
12/11/2007,marshall
|
good!
12/11/2007,marshall
|
too many of these symmetrical sun worshipper poses...
12/11/2007,marshall
|
|
|